Brides are Tightening Purse Strings
As a future bride, I found this AP article on msnbc.com to be of great interest. Not because of what it says about the economy, (looks like we’re experiencing more than just a period of “economic tightening” if even recession-proof industries are feeling the effects), but what it says about the costs of an “average” wedding.
The wedding industry has long been considered one of most recession-proof. Most brides, grooms and their parents see the “big day” as a once-in-a-lifetime event not to be skimped on. But unlike Cinderella and Prince Charming, who didn’t have to worry about a mortgage on the castle, more couples are finding it hard to swallow the average pricetag of items like wedding cakes (about $500), bridal gowns (around $1,300) and flowers (near $2,000).
I was shocked to read that the average bride spends $2000 on flowers. I understand spending $1200 on the dress (but that seems a bit high), and even $500 on a cake (especially if you’re favorite food in all the world is buttercream icing) - but flowers are one of the more forgettable elements of a wedding, unless you’re really doing something spectacular with them. Maybe I just feel this way because I prefer nearly any gift (food, clothes, jewelry) to flowers - why spend so much on something that dies in a day or two? Maybe I’m just not girly enough to understand the allure of freshly cut stems.
According to the Wedding Report Inc., the average cost of a wedding is down $28 over last year - to $28,704.
Many other couples… are cutting some corners as they put their weddings together. Wedding trend tracker The Wedding Report Inc. estimates the average cost of a wedding will dip slightly this year to $28,704, compared with $28,732 in 2007.
That runs counter to the trend of the past 15 years, when wedding spending has nearly doubled, according to Conde Nast data. Tammy Elliot, president of the Perfect Wedding Guide wedding planning Web site, noted that the market is growing quickly due to the children of baby boomers.
Wow.
My heart really goes out to those poor people who make a living off the industrial wedding machine. Assuming that this can be correlated to a decrease in profit, their average revenues have be down less than a tenth of a percent - they must really be feeling the pain.
Who are these people that can drop $30,000 on a single day?
The article goes on to explain one way cut some expenses is forgo your dream honeymoon:
Portofino, Italy, had been 30-year-old Kate Witten’s ideal honeymoon destination for four years. Witten, a yoga instructor who lives in Atlanta, and her boyfriend chose the Mediterranean fishing village just a few weeks after they started dating. But when they realized a few months ago how expensive it would be with the euro worth about $1.55, they nixed the idea and decided on South Africa instead.
“Who knows how long the euro is going to stay this way?” said Witten. She noted that their two-and-a-half week trip to South Africa will add up to a relatively hefty $8,000, but they will be able to stay at high-end hotels. “We would’ve had to really pick and choose carefully in Europe.”
Poor Kate Witten - she’s “settling” for an $8000 honeymoon in South Africa. I was feeling guilty about even considering a $3000 trip to the Bahamas (although, I bet that Kate and her fiancé have zero credit card debt or student loan debt, where as we have a lot of both). Maybe I should feel guilty.
Even if I had $100,000 to spend on the “dream” wedding mentioned in the article, there are so many other things I’d rather do with that kind of coin. Paying off debt is at the top of the list, naturally, followed by gifting a percentage to my church or local non-profit. I suppose if you have $100 grand to spend getting hitched; you probably don’t have any debt and are already quite the philanthropist.
Perhaps I’m just jealous. If I had managed my finances better in my 20’s, I’d probably be able to take an $8000 honeymoon, too.
